Re: I have seen a bug of Time::Local module

$now[4]+1

No. The number of the month is zero based in all the localtime and timelocal APIs. Only ~~strftime and~~ sprintf want the number of the month adjusted.

Update: D'oh - I should've known that all the *time functions behave the same with regards to their input parameters.

Comment on Re: I have seen a bug of Time::Local module Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: I have seen a bug of Time::Local module by ikegami (Patriarch) on Mar 31, 2011 at 07:27 UTC
Not strftime. Valid use: `strftime("%Y%m%d%H%M%S", localtime)` [download]	[reply] [d/l]