Re^3: Why are other popular languages very different from Perl when installing libraries, e.g. no testing needed and no compilation of C/C++ code done

in reply to Re^2: Why are other popular languages very different from Perl when installing libraries, e.g. no testing needed and no compilation of C/C++ code done
in thread Why are other popular languages very different from Perl when installing libraries, e.g. no testing needed and no compilation of C/C++ code done

I would really love to know for which sins you desperately desire to be forgiven?

I once smiled at a Python conference.

Guido told me to program in Perl for 10 years - after which I may ask for forgiveness. Only 7 more years to go.

Comment on Re^3: Why are other popular languages very different from Perl when installing libraries, e.g. no testing needed and no compilation of C/C++ code done

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Why are other popular languages very different from Perl when installing libraries, e.g. no testing needed and no compilation of C/C++ code done by hermida (Scribe) on Apr 06, 2011 at 17:07 UTC
I think I just threw up in my mouth... so utterly ridiculous	[reply]
Re^5: Why are other popular languages very different from Perl when installing libraries, e.g. no testing needed and no compilation of C/C++ code done by Anonymous Monk on Apr 06, 2011 at 18:09 UTC
I think I just threw up in my mouth... so utterly ridiculous I'd upgrade it to ricockulous :)	[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom