in reply to Re: Why are other popular languages very different from Perl when installing libraries, e.g. no testing needed and no compilation of C/C++ code done
in thread Why are other popular languages very different from Perl when installing libraries, e.g. no testing needed and no compilation of C/C++ code done
In terms of creating modules and distributions I think Perl has many wonderful tools, particularly Dist::Zilla and for building and installing more modern replacements for ExtUtils::MakeMaker which are Module::Build and Module::Install.
In a general sense going on what cdarke said I think there is a lot of work being done and still needs to be done to vastly lower the learning curve it takes for a brand new person to come into the Perl language and most importantly stay there. This is the community area when I have time I try to contribute to because I think it has big bang for the buck. On this one point I have to agree that Python has been doing a somewhat better job, making it so easy to find how to do things and then to do them. You know how new people are if things get too frustrating then bye bye they go to some other language. There is nothing more important than people if you don't have people you don't have a language. People who know Perl then train other people and it just snowballs from there. The old masters will retire one day and we need new, bright and innovative people coming in to keep the language thriving, evolving, dynamic, etc... you know what I mean it's been said millions of times before.
|
|---|