Re^2: ppm for Perl 5.10 on OS X

Thanks for the very quick reply!
Unfortunately, the links you give seem quite old.
The latest version of OS X (10.4) in the first link says "You can use the Perl 5.8.6 that comes with Tiger or build it yourself..."
Does that mean we can't use Perl 5.10? I doubt it, but the information is really quite old.
In the second link, the first thing it says is "If you have not already done so, upgrade to Mac OS 10.2 (Jaguar)..."
So, that's really going back a bit! (And again, it only talks about Perl 5.8.
So, it seems like the advantages of ActivePerl PPM (on OSX) are gone, and we're back to CPAN and building things ourselves. Not that it's impossible.
Hmm...
Lozzer

Comment on Re^2: ppm for Perl 5.10 on OS X

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: ppm for Perl 5.10 on OS X by Anonymous Monk on Apr 09, 2011 at 14:01 UTC
Does that mean we can't use Perl 5.10? I doubt it, but the information is really quite old. Put it to the test already :) So, it seems like the advantages of ActivePerl PPM (on OSX) are gone, and we're back to CPAN and building things ourselves. You might wish to consider buying a license/contract with ActiveState	[reply]
Re^4: ppm for Perl 5.10 on OS X by Anonymous Monk on Apr 11, 2011 at 07:11 UTC
>Does that mean we can't use Perl 5.10? I doubt it, but the >information is really quite old. >>Put it to the test already :) I thought you might say something like that! >So, it seems like the advantages of ActivePerl PPM (on >OSX) are gone, and we're back to CPAN and building things >ourselves. >>You might wish to consider buying a license/contract with >>ActiveState Well, no. It seems that Strawberry Perl is gaining ground in the Windows world, and if there are only a few packages for OSX, why not just go with raw Perl everywhere. Lozzer	[reply]