in reply to Re^7: Psychic Disconnect and Object Systems
in thread Psychic Disconnect and Object Systems
So, for goodness sake stop trying to defend your indefensible assertion that there is no difference between a constant and a write-once variable.
huh? I never said they were the same. Constants are subs that can be inlined that return a read-only variable (or something that pretends to be that), whereas read-only variables are SVs. What are you talking about? How does this even relate?
What about constant parameters and constant variables in C? All three are constructed at run-time.
What utter drivel.
How so? Did something get erased?
There is no such thing as "construction time" for a constant
What? How can you say constants aren't created? Why are you trying to prove they're created at compile-time? How does it matter?
I can't make any sense of your post. I definitely don't see how it shows that "read-only attributes" is a misnomer.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^9: Psychic Disconnect and Object Systems
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Apr 16, 2011 at 20:24 UTC | |
by ikegami (Patriarch) on Apr 17, 2011 at 07:15 UTC | |
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Apr 17, 2011 at 09:09 UTC | |
by ikegami (Patriarch) on Apr 17, 2011 at 16:56 UTC | |
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Apr 17, 2011 at 19:37 UTC | |
|