Re: PDL: string comparison to binary piddle

Just curious, but why aren't you using BioPerl for this? Is PDL faster or easier in your case? It's certainly not my area, but I would have guessed that BioPerl was set up for this.

perl -e 'print qq(Just another Perl Hacker\n)' # where's the irony switch?

Comment on Re: PDL: string comparison to binary piddle

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: PDL: string comparison to binary piddle by umeboshi (Acolyte) on Apr 27, 2011 at 12:16 UTC
It's kind of embarrassing but I didn't manage to install BioPerl on my comp. Also, I need to do atypical things for which there isn't a pre-written BioPerl function anyway. Anyway, I hope PDL is not slower than BioPerl and yes eventually I shall switch to BioPerl.	[reply]