in reply to Re: Legacy Code: "Dominoes = Bad"
in thread Legacy Code: "Dominoes = Bad"

I would quite frankly say that my chosen market-niche as of late consists of finding the “cast-off” code ... that (former) developers are quick to have a “Mission::Impossible™ attitude” toward ... (“the State Department will disavow all knowledge of your actions”) ... but that is very much still in service ... and staging an effective turn-around for that project.

“Life’s been good ... to me ... so far ...”

It would, indeed, be a wonderful thing if a software project ever actually reached the point:   GAME OVER.   “Congratulations, Mr. Phelps.   You won the game.   And the game, having now been won, will most assuredly never change.”   In my experience, “the game” is not like that ... and I, for one, am very glad indeed that it is not.   Because, if it were, I would not have a career.   Life goes on.   Business does not stop.   Everything that you accomplished last year, doesn’t mean one frippin’ thing this year.

---

And as for the “cheap (sic...) Java coders” .... well ... just because your accountant proclaims that something is “cheaper,” does not actually establish that it actually is.   (And if you don’t believe me on this, just ask your accountant what he or she thinks about “a ’cheaper’ accountant.”)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Legacy Code: "Dominoes = Bad"
by JavaFan (Canon) on Apr 29, 2011 at 12:00 UTC
    Everything that you accomplished last year, doesn’t mean one frippin’ thing this year.
    Too bad for you. A lot of what I've accomplished last year is still generating revenue for my employer this year.
Re^3: Legacy Code: "Dominoes = Bad"
by raybies (Chaplain) on Apr 29, 2011 at 11:49 UTC
    Buwahahahaha! I'm definitely using that "cheaper accountant" thing... Great thoughts, --Ray