in reply to chaining callbacks
Since you've already precluded my first thought (derived class implementation), how about a left field idea? Have the call back die with some "I don't do this stuff" string or object and have the call back caller figure it out. That way return results and normal execution are unaffected by the handling mechanism used for managing call back processing.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^2: chaining callbacks
by John M. Dlugosz (Monsignor) on May 07, 2011 at 07:04 UTC |