in reply to Re^5: Syntactic sugar for tail call optimizations
in thread Syntactic sugar for tail call optimizations

I thought you'd know that every recursive algorithm can be made into a tail-recursive one

Well - believe it or not - I knew. But your undocumented cut&paste doesn't worth it.

This thread is about syntactic alternatives to goto &sub for implementing tail-call patterns and not about your inquisitional tactics to sabotage threads you consider heretical.

So I better resort in not feeding the BUK!

And now you have the last word ... :)

Cheers Rolf

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: Syntactic sugar for tail call optimizations
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on May 27, 2011 at 18:46 UTC
    Well - believe it or not - I knew. But your undocumented cut&paste doesn't worth it.

    Hm. I assumed you'd remember from the last time we dicussed this.

    You bottled out of supporting your own pretensions that time also.

    This thread is about implementating tail call recursions,
    This thread is about syntactic alternatives to goto &sub for implementing tail-call patterns

    Next?

    sabotage threads you consider heretical.

    I don't consider the thread OP heretical, just a bad conclusion drawn on the basis of poor examples.

    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
    In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
[reply]
[reply]
        Thats off topic.
        why?
[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom