in reply to Re^3: (almost) foldl
in thread (almost) foldl
Your statement that you pointed out that someone wrote the code is not true. Where is it? Is it your code? It's not better, because it needs an extra 0 to the list.
Also, the topic clearly states "no extra modules". Yes, thank you, I know very well about List::Util, a great module. But you ignored that and answered I question I didn't ask, missing the point altogether.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^5: (almost) foldl
by ikegami (Patriarch) on Jun 14, 2011 at 22:37 UTC |