Re: Please, review my diagram
by Old_Gray_Bear (Bishop) on Jun 13, 2011 at 03:27 UTC
|
I would love to review your diagram. Please post it in your scratch-pad. I may be being a bit paranoid there, but I don't feel like opening a link to www.live-wtr.ru. I did not get to be an Old Gray Bear with out being Very Wary....
----
I Go Back to Sleep, Now.
OGB
| [reply] |
|
|
> Please post it in your scratch-pad.
How to do it?
BTW, here is an image, for those, who don't even want to download the pdf:
www.live-wtr.ru/leo/Tikz11.png
| [reply] |
Re: Please, review my diagram
by ww (Archbishop) on Jun 13, 2011 at 02:55 UTC
|
Is this an example of social engineering? I wouldn't open that file on a bet.
Paranoid? Maybe, but if I'm missing something, so be it.
And you'll probably do better with a Moose interest group, posting on a site where a .pdf -- or better, the diagram in its original form -- is allowed. | [reply] |
|
|
| [reply] |
|
|
Well, I went through the trouble to download through a proxy, scan for viruses .... the class looked very simple, like Point, and the diagram looked machine generated, but it was just a list of key/value pairs --- pdf not required, so I reiterate, you should post code :)
| [reply] |
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Please, review my diagram
by Anonymous Monk on Jun 13, 2011 at 00:05 UTC
|
How about posting a simple moose class instead, inside code tags?
package Point;
use Moose; # automatically turns on strict and warnings
has 'x' => (is => 'rw', isa => 'Int');
has 'y' => (is => 'rw', isa => 'Int');
...
| [reply] [d/l] |
|
|
| [reply] |