Re^2: Filling in missing values in an array

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Filling in missing values in an array by FunkyMonk (Bishop) on Jun 29, 2011 at 16:37 UTC
Though I'm not quite sure how tests 3-5 are supposed to go Neither was I! So I made it die (a.k.a throws an exception) when the array consists only of NULLs. Garbage in, garbage out, as we used to say. Exceptions prevent the garbage leaking out. If you decide it should do something other than die, just change this line: `die "No values found" if @arr && 0 == grep $_ ne '_', @arr;` [download]	[reply] [d/l]
Re^4: Filling in missing values in an array by Neighbour (Friar) on Jun 30, 2011 at 06:39 UTC
Yea, but when it dies, the tests are never executed (in my case). That's probably not what's supposed to happen :).	[reply]
Re^5: Filling in missing values in an array by FunkyMonk (Bishop) on Jun 30, 2011 at 10:07 UTC
If you don't want the code to die, you need to use something to catch the exception. I like Try::Tiny: `use Try::Tiny; my @bad = try { fill_in_the_blanks(qw<_ _ _>) } # fails catch { print "bad data!\n" }; my @good = try { fill_in_the_blanks(qw<_ 1 _>) } # succeeds catch { print "bad data!\n" };` [download]	[reply] [d/l]
Re^5: Filling in missing values in an array by Neighbour (Friar) on Jul 04, 2011 at 11:17 UTC
Ah, found out where things went wrong: My code dies with a 'No values found' for `is_deeply [fill_in_the_blanks(qw< >)], [qw< >], "( )";`. I thought that `throws_ok` didn't catch the `die` but that wasn't the case. Seems our approach of the 'empty array'-situation differs :)	[reply] [d/l] [select]