in reply to Re^2: XML::LibXML - WHAR HASH TREES WHAR?!
in thread XML::LibXML - WHAR HASH TREES WHAR?!

LibXML is doing things that way for perfectly defensible reasons. It's a thin wrapper around a C library.

If you'd like to simplify things on top of that, then by all means, start a project to fix it. Complaining about it on in SoPW, though, is unproductive.


"There is no shame in being self-taught, only in not trying to learn in the first place." -- Atrus, Myst: The Book of D'ni.

  • Comment on Re^3: XML::LibXML - WHAR HASH TREES WHAR?!

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: XML::LibXML - WHAR HASH TREES WHAR?!
by SineSwiper (Beadle) on Jul 15, 2011 at 19:35 UTC
    And I'm actually fine with that. I was just asking if I wasn't reinventing the wheel, though.