in reply to hash references
i gave refrence as you see
No, we don't see, because you don't show how that sub is called.
Why do you persistently ignore the advise from previous threads to actually read perlreftut and start to learn how references work in Perl?
Also I don't see any hash references which you mention in the post title. There's no reason for two separate hashes that hold the same information.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^2: hash references
by Anonymous Monk on Aug 01, 2011 at 11:44 UTC | |
by jethro (Monsignor) on Aug 01, 2011 at 12:04 UTC | |
by Anonymous Monk on Aug 01, 2011 at 12:19 UTC | |
by jethro (Monsignor) on Aug 01, 2011 at 14:36 UTC | |
by moritz (Cardinal) on Aug 01, 2011 at 11:49 UTC | |
by Anonymous Monk on Aug 01, 2011 at 11:57 UTC | |
by moritz (Cardinal) on Aug 01, 2011 at 12:01 UTC |