Re: hash references

Considering that %site1 and %site2 are the same, why not replace the subroutine by a much simpler

sub foo {1/0}  # Triggers Illegal division by zero
[download]

Comment on Re: hash references Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: hash references by ricDeez (Scribe) on Aug 01, 2011 at 14:22 UTC
Well, it would actually be: `sub foo {0/0}` [download] But I am totally with you on this... there is something badly wrong with how he is unpacking the vars into the subroutine!	[reply] [d/l]
Re^3: hash references by JavaFan (Canon) on Aug 01, 2011 at 14:33 UTC
Unless there's some overloaded constant in effect, there's no difference beteen `0/0` and `1/0`. Or `1238/0`.	[reply] [d/l] [select]