Re: Is it a bug in perl6 ?

You have a precedence error. [+] parses as a list operator, which is much looser than <=>. If you put parens around the first summation it will work as you expect in any of the implementations.

Comment on Re: Is it a bug in perl6 ? Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Is it a bug in perl6 ? by Anonymous Monk on Aug 02, 2011 at 02:28 UTC
Is any one of the various perl6 implementations yet complete, quick and stable enough for real work?	[reply]
Re^3: Is it a bug in perl6 ? by TimToady (Parson) on Aug 02, 2011 at 03:17 UTC
I'll answer that if you tell me what percentage of monks are complete, quick, and stable enough for real work? `:-)`	[reply]
Re^4: Is it a bug in perl6 ? by JavaFan (Canon) on Aug 02, 2011 at 14:05 UTC
I'll answer that if you tell me what percentage of monks are complete, quick, and stable enough for real work? Rounding up to the nearest integer, I estimate that percentage to be 1. (People who are complete, quick and stable enough for real work, do real work and don't waste their time on Perlmonks) JavaFan (missing parts, slow and volatile)	[reply]