in reply to Prototype mismatch using mod_perl
Second: is the line indicated doing what you want it to do? Are you sure? Completely? Do you have a test that proves it is doing what you wanted?
If you are 100% sure that the call is correct as it stands, add a leading ampersand to the call to the subroutine to tell Perl to ignore the prototype:
Do not just do this to "make it go away". You may have a real problem (in fact, you almost certainly do!). Be sure you don't before you change anything.# Prototype mismatch was occurring here: &index::encode(...);
Seriously. I considered whether or not to tell you this because I'm not sure you're going to do the legwork to ensure it's OK.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^2: Prototype mismatch using mod_perl
by AlfaProject (Beadle) on Aug 08, 2011 at 19:52 UTC | |
by Anonymous Monk on Aug 09, 2011 at 05:57 UTC | |
by AlfaProject (Beadle) on Aug 09, 2011 at 11:14 UTC | |
by Anonymous Monk on Aug 08, 2011 at 19:54 UTC | |
|
Re^2: Prototype mismatch using mod_perl
by AlfaProject (Beadle) on Aug 09, 2011 at 11:17 UTC | |
by kobargh (Novice) on Apr 17, 2012 at 12:43 UTC |