Re^2: Parallel::ForkManager is time consuming...takes too long

This example you have provided is indeed much faster than we had implented. I like to use the same style to solve a similar issue. I have two integer arrays that will be used in a sub-routine within if{} expressions. Each if{}-expression returns some values, as the afoementioned example. I assume I can not use the => operator for the hash in this case.

Comment on Re^2: Parallel::ForkManager is time consuming...takes too long

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Parallel::ForkManager is time consuming...takes too long by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Aug 15, 2011 at 20:21 UTC
Post some code, or pseudo code to explain what you mean, because I cannot makes sense of your description. Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.	[reply]
Re^4: Parallel::ForkManager is time consuming...takes too long by esolkc (Acolyte) on Aug 16, 2011 at 00:17 UTC
Let me rewrite ...	[reply]
Re^5: Parallel::ForkManager is time consuming...takes too long by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Aug 16, 2011 at 04:19 UTC
Sorry, but this code makes even less sense than your description. Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.	[reply]
Re^6: Parallel::ForkManager is time consuming...takes too long by esolkc (Acolyte) on Aug 16, 2011 at 12:39 UTC
Re^7: Parallel::ForkManager is time consuming...takes too long by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Aug 16, 2011 at 13:10 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here