Re^4: Can I get a -S switch that doesn't care about the execute bit?

Will wonders never cease??? Something Win32 is good for...

I don't have time to learn how to make my own pragma to accomplish this, so I'll probably go the make-all-the-scripts-executable route.

--DrWhy

"If God had meant for us to think for ourselves he would have given us brains. Oh, wait..."

Comment on Re^4: Can I get a -S switch that doesn't care about the execute bit?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Can I get a -S switch that doesn't care about the execute bit? by Anonymous Monk on Aug 23, 2011 at 08:24 UTC
It should be fairly trivial, simply locate the point where -x is tested, and add conditional (`!SvTRUE( get_sv("sx::y")`) In file util.c in function Perl_find_script `if (S_ISREG(PL_statbuf.st_mode) && cando(S_IRUSR,TRUE,&PL_statbuf) #if !defined(DOSISH) && !SvTRUE( get_sv("sx::y") && cando(S_IXUSR,TRUE,&PL_statbuf) #endif ) { xfound = tmpbuf; /* bingo! */ break; }` [download] and accompanying badly named pragma `package sx::y; $sx::y = $VERSION = 0.01; 1;` [download] when you recompile perl, use as `perl -Msx::y -S foo` Untested, so not in patch form	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^6: Can I get a -S switch that doesn't care about the execute bit? by DrWhy (Chaplain) on Aug 23, 2011 at 18:43 UTC
Of course the pragma should be properly named 'sexy.pm'. --DrWhy "If God had meant for us to think for ourselves he would have given us brains. Oh, wait..."	[reply]