Re^2: SQL::Abstract::More overloads the SQL::Abstract API

Sounds like you're volunteering? Thanks!

No, I'm having a software engineering discussion in order to further my understanding of where my viewpoint is sound/unsound.

what would you do?

I would use capitilized versions of the functions for my named parameter API.

What did the original author overlook?

Overlook? I just said I dont like the overloading - where a single function has two different behaviors based on the type of arguments passed.

How would you improve upon it?

See the answer to your question: "What would you do?"

Comment on Re^2: SQL::Abstract::More overloads the SQL::Abstract API

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: SQL::Abstract::More overloads the SQL::Abstract API by locked_user sundialsvc4 (Abbot) on Sep 02, 2011 at 15:11 UTC
“No, I’m having a software engineering discussion ...” Thank you, sincerely, for the clarification. It helps my understanding of your intentions for this thread quite considerably. I have no further objections, and I have nothing in particular to contribute, so I will now be “listening” attentively. I think it is good to examine such things.