in reply to Re: (updated) Perl6::FH
in thread (updated) Perl6::FH

No, I can't test for definedness, or else I'd never be able to say is_chomped FH undef for slurping mode. Granted, slurping mode doesn't require chomp()ing, but that doesn't mean I should neglect the user's wishes.

japhy -- Perl and Regex Hacker

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: (updated) Perl6::FH
by Masem (Monsignor) on Jun 28, 2001 at 21:07 UTC
    Then why not use something like "@_ >= 3", as opposed to "@_ == 3"? Again, I guess what I'm asking is more style than function...

    Dr. Michael K. Neylon - mneylon-pm@masemware.com || "You've left the lens cap of your mind on again, Pinky" - The Brain
[reply]

In Section Cool Uses for Perl