in reply to Re^4: Win32 limit to number of calls to system()?
in thread Win32 limit to number of calls to system()?

Don't think of it as explaining to whom you're replying, then... Think of it as explaining to the OP and everybody else.

I suspect there are a more than a few sympathy ++s when there are unexplained hostile responses.

  • Comment on Re^5: Win32 limit to number of calls to system()?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: Win32 limit to number of calls to system()?
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Sep 12, 2011 at 19:22 UTC
    I suspect there are a more than a few sympathy ++s when there are unexplained hostile responses.

    I don't doubt it, but I don't give a monkey's how much XP he earns. my only concern is highlighting the crap.

    See the highlighted note in my sig.

    If more of those capable of seeing through his crap would counter it, then my posts might no longer be seen as a personal tirade.

    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
    In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom