in reply to Revamping 'Best Nodes of All Time' List

Actually a lot of those posts are pretty recent, due to the inflation in the number of votes available each day.

Let's see what we have there:

Overall a nice selection of what goes on here.

So I think that list can stay as is, just the rawreputation of nodes.

What could be added, and it should be fun to do, is separate lists by specific topics. I guess for newcomers something with "the best generic posts on coding in Perl", including Death to Dot Star! for example, would be nice. For those interested in the sociological aspect of the Monastery a list of the most heated discussions (anything involving saving the ChatterBox or publishing the list of users would do I guess...), and of course the funniest posts (how about Life at the Monastery. Chapter 1 for example), plus a best PM how-to's (turnstep's home node already has something like this, etc....

Now how to compile those lists? I don't think relying on the post's reputation would work, it's too dependant on parameters such as when the node was posted. This more of an editor job(not in the sense of a janitor, but in the sense of a publisher).

I think some of the oldest monks could compile a first selection, then set up a voting process outside of the site (so Vroom does not have to get involved in that phase), generate the lists (maybe over a period of time, one per week/month, and maybe revisit them evry now and then with the addition of worthy new nodes) and send them to Vroom who then has just to add a link somewhere at the top of the page.

Any taker?

  • Comment on Re: Revamping 'Best Nodes of All Time' List

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Revamping 'Best Nodes of All Time' List
by nysus (Parson) on Jun 29, 2001 at 18:23 UTC
    Actually a lot of those posts are pretty recent, due to the inflation in the number of votes available each day.

    You raise a valid point but I think it's questionable at best to automatically assume that the inflation of votes balances out the artificial votes cast for nodes advertised on the "Best Nodes" list. It would take some number crunching to figure it out. My gut tells me that in a couple of months it will be near impossible for anyone to ever get on the "Best Nodes" list. We'll have to wait and see.

    $PM = "Perl Monk's";
    $MCF = "Most Clueless Friar Abbot";
    $nysus = $PM . $MCF;
    Click here if you love Perl Monks

      My gut based on having been here about a year is that the inflation does balance. Here are the nodes of mine that have managed to get near or into Best Nodes. (I really don't remember which made it there, but they were relatively close.) Not one survived there (though one is temporarily back thanks to the list being extended):
      1. The path to mastery
      2. Threads vs Forking (Java vs Perl)
      3. The nature of work (this had the longest stay)
      4. Why I like functional programming
      5. Random thoughts on programming (Did this get there?)
      6. Re (tilly) 1: How does strict work? (Another I am unsure on)
      7. Stay aware of security
      8. Is PerlMonks economically viable?
      Also note that a node from last week is (as of this post) within 7 points of getting onto the top 10. Even after the last week nodes go out, there is some upwards momentum. If a few people referred to it as a good node elsewhere, those 7 votes could be reached. And with some more inflation, it already would have been reached.

      No matter how impossible the goals in Best Nodes seems, don't underestimate inflation. The best nodes of today would have been on the best nodes of all time when I started. There is a lot of turnover in best nodes. Not if you watch it. But note the list, go away for a couple of months, and look again...