Re^5: Simulating --keep-session-cookies wget option with LWP ?

Your cookie looks like this:

$VAR1 = [
          0,
          'JSESSIONID',
          '1F627DA1EED0B70CC94F4D3EB9ECD378.host',
          '/manager',
          'host.local',
          undef,
          1,
          undef,
          undef,
          1,
          {}
        ];
[download]

The HTTP::Cookies documentation says about the format:

  0  version
  1  key
  2  val
  3  path
  4  domain
  5  port
  6  path_spec
  7  secure
  8  expires
  9  discard
 10  hash
[download]

The ninth parameter, discard is 1 in your cookie. Why do you think that HTTP::UserAgent should save this cookie into a file?

As to your "negative" reputation, your nodes are currently at "-1" and "0" respectively. I downvoted both of them, because you did not do show any relevant code first, and then did no work on making the problem easily reproducible outside your specific environment.

Comment on Re^5: Simulating --keep-session-cookies wget option with LWP ? Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: Simulating --keep-session-cookies wget option with LWP ? by i5513 (Pilgrim) on Sep 27, 2011 at 11:57 UTC
Hello, Thank you clarifying that issue, using ignore_discard attribute in HTTP::cookies, made the code works. `my $cookie_jar = HTTP::Cookies->new( file => "mycookie-tomcat.cookie", autosave => 1, ignore_discard => 1 );` [download] I don't know if can be future problems with this option enabled. In my case (pooling tomcat manager I suppose that should not be any problem). Thank you again PD: I hope this node doesn't appear two times, if so , sorry	[reply] [d/l]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^6: Simulating --keep-session-cookies wget option with LWP ?
by i5513 (Pilgrim) on Sep 27, 2011 at 11:57 UTC

Thank you clarifying that issue, using ignore_discard attribute in HTTP::cookies, made the code works.

my $cookie_jar = HTTP::Cookies->new(
        file => "mycookie-tomcat.cookie",
        autosave => 1,
    ignore_discard => 1
);
[download]

I don't know if can be future problems with this option enabled. In my case (pooling tomcat manager I suppose that should not be any problem).

[reply]
[d/l]