in reply to Re: Meditation on Quantum::Entanglement
in thread Meditation on Quantum::Entanglement

Yes, I suppose that a straightforward "brute force" implementation would easily get out of hand in terms of how many states and how many combinations of states exist! After all, you could simply ask it to find a and b such that a*b == some very large prime number.

But, you can do the same thing with a couple lines of Prolog. You can also write a "perfect" chess program in Pascal, but it will take forever to make its first move.

There are systems that do constraint-based programming, such as Trilogy, Prolog, and CLP. When used correctly, it's no slower than the code you'd have to write to solve the problem anyway.

I agree that this module is too slow for anything significant, in terms of modeling solutions based on that kind of logic. I suppose it's exactly what you want if you are in fact writing programs for quantum mechanical physics work. But, call it a proof-of-concept of Entanglement of variables.

—John

  • Comment on Re: Re: Meditation on Quantum::Entanglement