Re^5: Win32, fork and XS globals

Why not address your replies to the person asking the question, cos I already know this stuff.

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

Comment on Re^5: Win32, fork and XS globals

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: Win32, fork and XS globals (Answer to BUk's OT question) by ikegami (Patriarch) on Oct 02, 2011 at 18:40 UTC
I was contradicting you. If you knew what I said, then why did you say the opposite?!?!?	[reply]
Re^7: Win32, fork and XS globals by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Oct 02, 2011 at 19:33 UTC
Nothing you said, contradicted anything I said. Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.	[reply]
Re^8: Win32, fork and XS globals by ikegami (Patriarch) on Oct 02, 2011 at 21:37 UTC
You pointed out it's not useful for static data. I contradicted that. You said "_" was invisible. I contradicted that. You indicated the use of "a", "d" and "p" was problematic. I contradicted that. If you knew what you said was wrong, why did you say it, and why do you fault me for correcting it?	[reply]
Re^9: Win32, fork and XS globals by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Oct 02, 2011 at 23:21 UTC
Re^10: Win32, fork and XS globals by ikegami (Patriarch) on Oct 03, 2011 at 03:18 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here
Re^10: Win32, fork and XS globals by ikegami (Patriarch) on Oct 03, 2011 at 03:34 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here