Re: Storing simple Value Pairs

I do not feel that using a hash here is wasteful whatsoever, so i would comfortably use a hash to store these values. They are called X and Y, after all, and not 0 and 1. I certainly would have no aversion to using a Moose object either.

has X => ( is => 'rw' );
has Y => ( is => 'rw' );
[download]

jeffa

L-LL-L--L-LL-L--L-LL-L--
-R--R-RR-R--R-RR-R--R-RR
B--B--B--B--B--B--B--B--
H---H---H---H---H---H---
(the triplet paradiddle with high-hat)

Comment on Re: Storing simple Value Pairs Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Storing simple Value Pairs by raybies (Chaplain) on Oct 19, 2011 at 18:46 UTC
...perhaps if Moose were core, I wouldn't have a problem with it either, but at this point, installation is quite labor intensive (network airgap), and an assortment of firewalls hurdles...	[reply]