in reply to Re^9: aXML vs TT2
in thread aXML vs TT2

it cannot distinguish code from data. That's really really really really really really bad.

It sounds, to my untrained ear, like you just condemned the entire Lisp language family and several others.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^11: aXML vs TT2
by chromatic (Archbishop) on Oct 23, 2011 at 00:39 UTC

    Lisp has a defined execution strategy which isn't "apply this regexp substitution until you can't".


    Improve your skills with Modern Perl: the free book.

Re^11: aXML vs TT2
by ikegami (Patriarch) on Oct 23, 2011 at 05:48 UTC

    I don't know Lisp, but I'm sure it can construct strings with the same name as macros/subs/whatever.

    It turns out aXML can too, but it requires creating a whole other template in some cases!