in reply to Objects: Classical and Functional

How to see what this actually prints? 

$ perl a2.pl | tr \\r \\n | uniq

Just  |another  |Perl  |hacker,  
 Just |another  | Perl |hacker,  
 Just |nother  a| Perl |acker,  h
  Just|nother  a|  Perl|acker,  h
  Just|other  an|  Perl|cker,  ha
  Just|ther  ano|  Perl|ker,  hac
t  Jus|ther  ano|l  Per|ker,  hac
t  Jus|her  anot|l  Per|er,  hack
st  Ju|her  anot|rl  Pe|er,  hack
st  Ju|er  anoth|rl  Pe|r,  hacke
st  Ju|r  anothe|rl  Pe|,  hacker
ust  J|r  anothe|erl  P|,  hacker

[download]
…

Also, it turns out the bless isn't even necessary. I replaced it with + and the code still works. I'm a bit disappointed.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Objects: Classical and Functional
by davido (Cardinal) on Oct 25, 2011 at 10:22 UTC

    Oh, good call. :)

    I pulled so much of the guts out of my original OO approach that it no longer needed an object, just a namespace as provided by the hash ref. I thought I had tried that (the plus), but it must have been on an earlier revision where the constructor was still its own function. Thanks for having a look.


    Dave

[reply]

In Section Obfuscated Code