Re^21: Is an aXML compiler possible?

No, I'm pointing out that the code of this site suffers from a problem which requires a certain level of knowledge and understanding to get around.

HA!

Please tell me how to know what the output of that program is, WITHOUT inspecting the code of the package foo...

Already explained to you many times, that isn't even close to what aXML does.

The closes equivalent that resembles print foo(bar(baz())); would be print eval foo( eval bar( eval baz() ) ) ); except its really

$program = 'foo(bar(baz())';
while( evalable $program  ){
   $program = eval $program;
}
print $program;
[download]

In otherwords, rocket-brainf-ck

if you can I will accept the criticism as valid, if you cannot, then I will consider that criticism, like all the others, as firmly refuted.

HA!

Comment on Re^21: Is an aXML compiler possible? Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^22: Is an aXML compiler possible? by Logicus (Initiate) on Oct 31, 2011 at 20:22 UTC
The new Plack based aXML does not use eval. well ok one, only one, of the plugins uses it... but I haven't actually used that plugin at all so far in this new build and the PerlNights test case. It amazes me how keen you people are to criticise something you clearly do not understand.	[reply]
Re^23: Is an aXML compiler possible? by Anonymous Monk on Oct 31, 2011 at 21:02 UTC
The new Plack based aXML does not use eval. well ok one, only one, of the plugins uses it... but I haven't actually used that plugin at all so far in this new build and the PerlNights test case. How you actually changed the implementation is irrelevant, your language definition, your "paradigm shift", has remained the same It amazes me how keen you people are to criticise something you clearly do not understand. Ha!	[reply]
Re^24: Is an aXML compiler possible? by Logicus (Initiate) on Oct 31, 2011 at 22:43 UTC
Oh how I wish you had guts enough to use a proper account to make your stupid little comments with; then when your finally proven wrong people will know what an idiot you are.	[reply]
Re^25: Is an aXML compiler possible? by Anonymous Monk on Oct 31, 2011 at 22:53 UTC
Re^26: Is an aXML compiler possible? by Anonymous Monk on Oct 31, 2011 at 22:54 UTC
Re^26: Is an aXML compiler possible? by Logicus (Initiate) on Oct 31, 2011 at 23:20 UTC
Re^25: Is an aXML compiler possible? by Anonymous Monk on Oct 31, 2011 at 23:53 UTC
Re^26: Is an aXML compiler possible? by Logicus (Initiate) on Nov 01, 2011 at 01:56 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here