in reply to Re^6: Win32 - flock() not FIFO?
in thread Win32 - flock() not FIFO?

Implementing a concurrent webserver with threads took a lot of time - it took .09 sec to create a new thread, but only .04 sec to service the AJAX request. So I ended up re-writing (doing a lot of that lately) the concurrent server as an iterative server.

I assume you were starting a new thread for each client? Perl's threading implementation carries to much overhead with starting a new thread to make that a viable option. Actually, I'd say that even in C that starting a new (kernel) thread for every brief exchange is an extremely wasteful way of handling connectionless protocols.

Far better is to use a pool of threads. For an example of handling concurrent sockets see Re^7: multithreaded tcp listener with IO::Socket. It probably needs checking as it was written back in the 5.8.6 days and quite a lot has changed in the interim. If you are thinking of using it as the basis for anything, let me know and I'll give it the once over.


With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.