Re^2: The speed of blessed hashrefs, the power of Moose

decimate performance

10%? That's really not bad at all.

Comment on Re^2: The speed of blessed hashrefs, the power of Moose - how to get both?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: The speed of blessed hashrefs, the power of Moose - how to get both? by Anonymous Monk on Nov 20, 2011 at 18:18 UTC
`moose : 67476/s hashref : 724638/s` [download] 724638 / 67476 = 10.739 = deci-mated. And what does it bring us, in real terms?	[reply] [d/l]
Re^4: The speed of blessed hashrefs, the power of Moose - how to get both? by chromatic (Archbishop) on Nov 21, 2011 at 01:54 UTC
I can neologize with the best of them too, but I often choose to use the normal definitions of words to communicate my thoughts accurately to other people. And what does it bring us, in real terms? My IO bound programs are a lot shorter, easier to read, and more correct. That seems fair. (I could write my IO bound programs in C instead, but the same reasoning applies. There's only so fast you can block on an `epoll` loop.) Improve your skills with Modern Perl: the free book.	[reply] [d/l]