in reply to Re^2: We should elminate: Anonymous, and DOWN-voting
in thread We should elminate: Anonymous, and DOWN-voting

It does work but the threads are still there so if/when anyone else participates you'll see those nodes in Newest or Recent Threads. While I do use the blocking css you posted, I still sometimes end up stumbling into a thread I would have otherwise preferred to ignore ( like this one ;-) ).


UPDATE
Same Day :: 3:28 PM :: Turns out I was wrong. As long as tables are displayed as divs in the Display Settings, MidLifeXis' css works well. Apologies.


"...the adversities born of well-placed thoughts should be considered mercies rather than misfortunes." — Don Quixote
  • Comment on Re^3: We should ... Trouble with Ignoring/Blocking Anonymous

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: We should ... Trouble with Ignoring/Blocking Anonymous
by MidLifeXis (Monsignor) on Dec 02, 2011 at 19:16 UTC

    I don't use it myself, so I should probably look into that. :-)

    --MidLifeXis

[reply]

      It would be quite simple for the gods to alter the code to add a class attribute to table rows created by anonymous monks, which could then be set to display:none; in a custom CSS file. Of course that would require that they gave a shit, which they have clearly demonstrated they don't UNLESS the anonymonk feature is used to abuse them. (IE, it's fine for you to abuse each other with it as much as you want)

[reply]

        It would be quite simple for the gods to alter the code to add a class attribute to table rows created by anonymous monks, which could then be set to display:none; in a custom CSS file. Of course that would require that they gave a shit, which they have clearly demonstrated they don't UNLESS the anonymonk feature is used to abuse them. (IE, it's fine for you to abuse each other with it as much as you want)

        Yeah, this feature is already available, and it works

[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion