in reply to Re^9: We should elminate: Anonymous, and DOWN-voting
in thread We should elminate: Anonymous, and DOWN-voting

Says the person posting anonymously. If I can't impact your rating, then why aren't you posting on your account? You're voiding your own argument.

My account is Anonymous Monk. I don't get to vote, I don't get to chatter, I don't get experience points.

And yes, you do get one vote per office, but I notice that that still means you can't vote against the same person multiple times per day. And it isn't retroactive - you can't go back in time and vote in every previous election he's ever been in either.

You vote for nodes not monks, you aren't electing any monk to any office.

  • Comment on Re^10: We should elminate: Anonymous, and DOWN-voting

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^11: We should elminate: Anonymous, and DOWN-voting
by TJPride (Pilgrim) on Dec 04, 2011 at 15:50 UTC
    Every node is tied to a monk, so essentially you're voting for or against that monk. I'm not going to argue this point further, it's a waste of time debating with anyone posting anonymously.

      Every node is tied to a monk, so essentially you're voting for or against that monk. I'm not going to argue this point further, it's a waste of time debating with anyone posting anonymously.

      It is also a waste of time to debate with TJPride, complaining about a system he doesn't understand , he never RTFM'd

        Well said my fellow __ME__
      Now your getting the picture. There is a social contract here, and it includes bending over and taking it up the meat-space ejection pipe from the anonymonk. Don't like it? Your browser back button is over there, why don't you go hang out with illogicus on his stupid site?