in reply to Re^6: We should elminate: Anonymous, and DOWN-voting
in thread We should elminate: Anonymous, and DOWN-voting

It is the essence of democratic and free voting that it is done only subject to your own conscience and that you never ever have to give a reason why you did it.
Perlmonks is not a democracy.
  • Comment on Re^7: We should elminate: Anonymous, and DOWN-voting

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^8: We should elminate: Anonymous, and DOWN-voting
by ruzam (Curate) on Dec 06, 2011 at 14:16 UTC
    I thought we were an autonomous collective?

      You're fooling yourself. We're living in a dictatorship!

Re^8: We should elminate: Anonymous, and DOWN-voting
by CountZero (Bishop) on Dec 06, 2011 at 18:58 UTC
    Perlmonks is not a democracy.
    I never said it is.

    CountZero

    A program should be light and agile, its subroutines connected like a string of pearls. The spirit and intent of the program should be retained throughout. There should be neither too little or too much, neither needless loops nor useless variables, neither lack of structure nor overwhelming rigidity." - The Tao of Programming, 4.1 - Geoffrey James

Re^8: We should elminate: Anonymous, and DOWN-voting
by Anonymous Monk on Dec 06, 2011 at 11:26 UTC

    Perlmonks is not a democracy.

    Le duh