in reply to Re^3: Efficient way to handle huge number of records?
in thread Efficient way to handle huge number of records?
I don't have any real experience with 32bit Linux machines with more than 2GB of memory, so your knowledge in this area is gospel. The specs said it could, but I didn't realize it was a hack.
I do have more experience with 32/64bit Unix machines, and found that most 64bit applications (including Perl) required more than twice the real memory as on a 32bit Unix. Now, I haven't checked this in quite a while, so I'll have to revisit that. It could have been the 64bit version of the compiler or something else. I will be installing an IBM power 7 p-series p740 with 128GB in January. I will try some benchmarks and let you know. Power 7 is only 64bit.
Thank you
"Well done is better than well said." - Benjamin Franklin
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^5: Efficient way to handle huge number of records?
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Dec 11, 2011 at 18:22 UTC | |
by flexvault (Monsignor) on Dec 11, 2011 at 21:26 UTC |