Re^11: Memory leak!

Not "claimed" DE-MON-STRA-TED!

It's not for(;;) generating that, it's Deparse. Do you run your code through Deparse to run it? I don't.

As already shown, for(;;) does not generate a constant. Here's for you to ignore again:

$ perl -MO=Concise,-exec -e'for(;;){}'
1  <0> enter 
2  <;> nextstate(main 3 -e:1) v:{
3  <{> enterloop(next->5 last->6 redo->4) v
4  <0> stub v
5  <0> unstack v
-e syntax OK
[download]

NOBODY SAID YOU SAID ....

"the way you choose to view this is that"

"You're still defending"

Is there another "you" I should know about?

And yet, you're still defending your 100% definitive, wrong assertions. As always.

Nah, just contradicting lies about me such as this one.

Comment on Re^11: Memory leak! Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^12: Memory leak! by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Dec 13, 2011 at 07:42 UTC
You admit your mistake here, and continue to defend misassertions you made based upon that mistake everywhere else. Who is lying? With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday' Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. The start of some sanity?	[reply]
Re^13: Memory leak! by ikegami (Patriarch) on Dec 13, 2011 at 07:54 UTC
And it's not a misassertion. A premise of an argument being false doesn't make the conclusion of the argument false. Why do you think `while()` works when it's not legal C.	[reply] [d/l]
Re^13: Memory leak! by ikegami (Patriarch) on Dec 13, 2011 at 07:45 UTC
Nah, just contradicting lies about me such as this one. I did not continue to defend any assertion based on the fact that a condition-less while is possible.	[reply]