Re^3: "next" from within eval {} ?

Fair enough. T'was nought but a thought :)

Funnily enough, I don't get the warning on 5.10.

#! perl -slw
use strict;

sub do_foo { $_ != 3 or die "foo == 3" }
sub do_bar { $_ != 4 or die "bar == 4" }

for (1..5) {
    eval {
        next unless do_foo();
        next unless do_bar();
        #...
        1;
    } or do {
        warn $@;
        next;
    };
    print;
}

__END__
c:\test>junk47
1
2
foo == 3 at C:\test\junk47.pl line 4.
bar == 4 at C:\test\junk47.pl line 5.
5
[download]

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

The start of some sanity?

Comment on Re^3: "next" from within eval {} ? Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: "next" from within eval {} ? by Anonymous Monk on Dec 15, 2011 at 17:32 UTC
"Funnily enough, I don't get the warning on 5.10." I think the `next` has to actually "execute" to generate the warning. In your modified version, the functions `die` instead of returning false (only the latter would trigger the execution of the `next`). I do get the warning with all versions I've tested (5.10.0, 5.10.1, 5.12.3, 5.14.1).	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^5: "next" from within eval {} ? by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Dec 15, 2011 at 17:49 UTC
Of course. With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday' Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. The start of some sanity?	[reply]