Re^3: Surprised by Perl parse of ternary operator

bend the rules differently.

I wouldn't exactly call it "bending the rules". For perl or the other two.

I read it that perl uses a minimal munch approach at that point of the syntax and hence sees:

( ( $fred == 42) ? ( $config = 'k1') : ( $config ) ) = 'k2';
[download]

Whereas the other two use a maximal munch approach and so see:

( $fred == 42 ) ? ( $config = 'k1' ) : ( $config = 'k2' );
[download]

I think the use case for Perl's way is using the ternary as the lvalue target of assignment. Something like:

$lo = $hi = 0; 
$x = 7; $mid = 5; 

$x < $mid ? $lo : $hi = $x; 

print "lo:$lo hi:$hi";;
lo:0 hi:7
[download]

Can Ruby or PHP do that?

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

Comment on Re^3: Surprised by Perl parse of ternary operator Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Surprised by Perl parse of ternary operator by Anonymous Monk on Dec 16, 2011 at 15:32 UTC
Can Ruby or PHP do that? No, at least Ruby seems to lack a concept of a "variable" lvalue. `(foo = bar) = 5` gives a syntax error, and `x < mid ? lo : hi = x` gets parsed as `x < mid ? lo : (hi = x)`	[reply] [d/l] [select]