in reply to Re: ref to read-only alias ... why?
in thread ref to read-only alias ... why?

could you plz tell me how my code reacts? Re: ref to read-only alias ... why?

I'm working on v5.10.0.

Cheers Rolf

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: ref to read-only alias ... why?
by morgon (Priest) on Jan 05, 2012 at 23:57 UTC
    5.14.2 behaves as in your posting.

    5.14.1 dies with "Modification of a read-only value attempted".

      Thanks.

      Looks like they tried to fix this in 14.1 but had to fall back to old behavior.

      Cheers Rolf