Re^8: Why is const x const not a const?

You are forcing the issue there with the otherwise pointless parens.

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

Comment on Re^8: Why is const x const not a const?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^9: Why is const x const not a const? by ikegami (Patriarch) on Jan 23, 2012 at 22:12 UTC
Yes, I forced the use of the range operator. After all, we are talking about the range operator. I didn't say «`for (CONST..CONST)`» flattens; I said «`CONST..CONST`» does, and I was referring to the range operator.	[reply] [d/l] [select]