in reply to Re: "Automated" benchmarking
in thread "Automated" benchmarking

Besides the verbose and pretty output of Devel::NYTProf it is also quite more accurate than Devel::SmallProf!

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: "Automated" benchmarking
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jan 24, 2012 at 12:02 UTC

    In what way?


    With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
    In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

    The start of some sanity?

      The overhead introduced by Devel::SmallProf for every Perl sentence executed is too high resulting in a non-linear distortion of time measurements.
        a non-linear distortion of time measurements.

        I'd be interested to know more about the "non-linearity" if you have the time to explain further.

        But for the most part, the absolute accuracy of the timings is of little importance to profiling.

        The important factor is the relative timing, and the consistency those relative timings from run to run.


        With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
        Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
        "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
        In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

        The start of some sanity?

        A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.