in reply to Re: How many loops are there in Perl?
in thread How many loops are there in Perl?

... the naked-block isn't a loop ... without a label and goto[.]

Or at least a (possibly conditional) redo (see also Loop Control):

perl -wMstrict -le "my $i = 1; { print qq{in naked loop $i}; redo if $i++ < 3; } " in naked loop 1 in naked loop 2 in naked loop 3

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: How many loops are there in Perl?
by adamcrussell (Hermit) on Jan 31, 2012 at 22:14 UTC
    I have always thought redo was cool. At first glance it doesn't look anything like a goto because it is usually used with bare blocks. The code below has redo going to the start of the nearest enclosing block.
    { print "Enter a number 0-9\n"; $number=<STDIN>; chomp($number); unless(length($number) == 1 && $number =~ /[0-9]/){ print "C'mon, man! give me a number 0-9!\n"; redo; } }
    However, redo can take an argument (a block label) which makes it look much more goto-ish and less like elegant Perl. For example, we could redo (pun intended!) the example like this:
    GET_NUMBER:{ print "Enter a number 0-9\n"; $number=<STDIN>; chomp($number); unless(length($number) == 1 && $number =~ /[0-9]/){ print "C'mon, man! give me a number 0-9!\n"; redo GET_NUMBER; } }
    The biggest difference between redo and a pure goto is that redo must go to an enclosing block label whereas goto goes to any label. This is still a valid redo:
    my $number; PROMPT_FOR_NUMBER:{ print "Enter a number 0-9\n"; GET_NUMBER:{ $number=<STDIN>; chomp($number); unless(length($number) ==1 && $number =~ /[0-9]/){ print "You don't want to give me one number ?\n"; redo PROMPT_FOR_NUMBER; } } }
    <jc> Why do people persist in asking me stupid questions?
    <Petruchio> <insert mutually recursive response>
    --an exchange from #perlmonks on irc.slashnet.org(2 March 2009 1345 EST)