Re: Curious about a quirk with the special variable, $0

As an aside: for my $count (0 .. 9) is more Perlish, safer and easier to read than using a C for loop to do the same job.

True laziness is hard work

Comment on Re: Curious about a quirk with the special variable, $0 Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Curious about a quirk with the special variable, $0 by mrdurtal (Scribe) on Feb 01, 2012 at 08:07 UTC
Very cool, crisp, thanks. Is it safer because it reduces the risk of a typo? Or, is there something in the actual interpretation/compiling phase that can go wrong? :There is more than one way to @verb a cat:	[reply]
Re^3: Curious about a quirk with the special variable, $0 by Anonymous Monk on Feb 01, 2012 at 08:13 UTC
Yes, safer as in more idiot proof. See fencepost error	[reply]
Re^4: Curious about a quirk with the special variable, $0 by mrdurtal (Scribe) on Feb 01, 2012 at 19:54 UTC
Good read, thanks. :There is more than one way to @verb a cat:	[reply]