in reply to Re^2: (Almost) Simultaneous Node Approval
in thread (Almost) Simultaneous Node Approval

Sorry, I didn't intend to come across as annoyed. What you described in your initial node sounded like completely normal and expected behaviour in a slightly unusual, but not unexpected, situation.

I don't understand what you mean by "I reported an exception". Maybe you mean there was some message or text that was out of the ordinary that you didn't report? If that was the case and you can browse back to the page it may be of interest to the site maintainers if you post the actual error or warning text. Note that there are many thousands of lines of code and many thousands of lines of HTML the make up PerlMonks so it is unlikely that a vague description of something that might be an error message will elicit and "ahh" response from the maintainers.

True laziness is hard work
  • Comment on Re^3: (Almost) Simultaneous Node Approval

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: (Almost) Simultaneous Node Approval
by kcott (Archbishop) on Feb 07, 2012 at 23:15 UTC

    OK. No worries.

    The reported message that was out of the ordinary was "Approved by ww" which appeared after I had completed the approval process. The expected message would obviously have been "Approved by kcott".

    -- Ken

      The expected message would obviously have been "Approved by kcott".

      Of course not. I thought you might have been expecting some kind of error message, but expecting it to say "Approved by kcott" when it was approved by ww makes no sense.