Re^3: Standard way for displaying a script's output.

Geez! Talk about overkill.

First, look at the last line of my post.

Second, are you really suggesting that every sample posted to ask a question here has to include a Usage section? Why not require formal test suite; and a perltidy formatting; and PBB compliance enforced by a documented, full perlcritic clean pass. Not forgetting a full GPL3 notice, liability waver. And a git repository link...

If we raise the bar high enough ...

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

The start of some sanity?

Comment on Re^3: Standard way for displaying a script's output.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Standard way for displaying a script's output. by Anonymous Monk on Feb 11, 2012 at 11:27 UTC
Geez! Talk about overkill. choice is choice First, look at the last line of my post. What post? Why? JK? JK does not computer Second, are you really suggesting that every sample posted to ask a question here has to include a Usage section? For my template, sure, why not, goes along with the -s option , so it might as well Why require ... If we raise the bar high enough ... No thanks, I stay out of bars	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^4: Standard way for displaying a script's output.
by Anonymous Monk on Feb 11, 2012 at 11:27 UTC

Geez! Talk about overkill.

choice is choice

First, look at the last line of my post.

What post? Why? JK? JK does not computer

Second, are you really suggesting that every sample posted to ask a question here has to include a Usage section?

For my template, sure, why not, goes along with the -s option , so it might as well

Why require ... If we raise the bar high enough ...

No thanks, I stay out of bars

[reply]