Re^4: Locked threads and tcp timeouts

Why do you keep spouting the same, groundless, unfounded, garbage?

Didn't you read the clear & unequivocal data I posted in response to the last time you spouted this tosh, that completely refutes it?

It is beginning to feel like Groundhog Day around here.

Have you heard the one that goes something like: Doing [saying] the same thing over and over again and expecting a different outcome, is either first sign of madness or senility.

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

The start of some sanity?

Comment on Re^4: Locked threads and tcp timeouts

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Locked threads and tcp timeouts by jffry (Hermit) on Feb 16, 2012 at 16:05 UTC
Doing saying the same thing over and over again and expecting a different outcome, is either first sign of madness or senility. I am in no way arguing against your expertise in threaded programming nor defending sundial's statements. I just can't stand that cliché. Please forgive my interruption.	[reply]
Re^6: Locked threads and tcp timeouts by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Feb 16, 2012 at 16:26 UTC
Do not confuse perseveration and perseverance. With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday' Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. The start of some sanity?	[reply]