in reply to Which is better: ActiveState or Strawberry Perl?
Active State does a lot of work on the "look and feel" for the graphical (GUI) modules like Tk. It will look to the user like a native Windows application (that it is a Perl application is almost unnoticeable). I have never used Strawberry for a serious project before so I cannot comment on how well or not well that they have done on that part, but I can say that Active State does very well.
Some of the Active State utilities have no counterpart of which I am aware on Strawberry or other Perl distributions. For example, I wanted to add a developer to one of my freeware projects, I sent him what Active State calls a "profile" which is an XML file and he runs it (this does take awhile) but, bingo he has now "cloned" my system with every module that I have.
I do have a license for the Active State Perl Development Kit and this thing makes deploying .exe files much easier than with Strawberry. But you have to pay for this.
Overall, I have not seen any advantage to go with Strawberry.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^2: Which is better: ActiveState or Strawberry Perl?
by Anonymous Monk on Feb 17, 2012 at 08:33 UTC | |
by Marshall (Canon) on Feb 17, 2012 at 09:10 UTC | |
by Anonymous Monk on Feb 17, 2012 at 09:22 UTC | |
by Marshall (Canon) on Feb 17, 2012 at 09:47 UTC | |
by Anonymous Monk on Feb 17, 2012 at 09:53 UTC |