in reply to (tye)Re2: Hiding Internal Classes ?
in thread Hiding Internal Classes ?

What's interesting is that $x2 doesn't have the cache like $x1 does. If the class is per-class, as I thought, then blessing it doesn't "connect" it to the cache yet.

(I plead inocent! Undefing the package was not my idea.)

  • Comment on Re: (tye)Re2: Hiding Internal Classes ?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
(tye)Re3: Hiding Internal Classes ?
by tye (Sage) on Jul 11, 2001 at 01:58 UTC

    I think the cache is per-class but $x2 tries to look up the cache by name and can't find it while $x1 has a direct link to the cache whose name was removed when you undefed the package.

            - tye (but my friends call me "Tye")
[reply]
      Yea, blessing it didn't point to the cache yet. I wonder why?
[reply]

In Section Meditations