in reply to List::MoreUtils before, after and ... between?
I don't think your solution is that bad. If you want to get rid of the two reverse, I think you have to buy and additional list function instead, for instance:
I consider this even more ugly. Alternatively you could tryList::MoreUtils::after_incl { $_ !~ /DBIC/ } List::MoreUtils::after_incl { /DBIC/ } List::MoreUtils::before { /Dancer/ } @YourList
Whether this is more readable, is something to be questioned, but at least the code can be generalized easier to more than 2 "pattern changes". However, it silently assumes that part traverses the list left to right, which is not guaranteed by the documentation.my $partition=0; my @parts = List::MoreUtils::part { if($pivots[0]) { if($partition % 2 == 0) { if($_ =~ $pivots[0]) { ++$partition; } } else { if($_ !~ $pivots[0]) { ++$partition; shift @pivots; } } } $partition } qw<eval DBIC::3 DBIC::2 DBIC::1 MyApp::3 MyApp::2 MyApp::1 Dancer::3 + Dancer::2 Dancer::1>; print join(',',@{ $parts[2] }),"\n";
Another solution (which does not use reverse) would be
but this is forcing the pairwise function to something in a way it was not really meant to be used (since the result of pairwise is never used). Maybe you are better off writing a conventional loop and storing the state (inside / outside your pattern sequence) in a status variable, similar to my part example, but without (mis-)using List::MoreUtils.my @input=qw<eval DBIC::3 DBIC::2 DBIC::1 MyApp::3 MyApp::2 MyApp::1 D +ancer::3 Dancer::2 Dancer::1>; my @firsts=@input[0..@input-2]; my @seconds=@input[1..@input-1]; my $inside=0; my @result; List::MoreUtils::pairwise { if($inside == 1) { my $pat=qr(Dancer); push @result,$a; if($a !~ $pat && $b =~ $pat) { $inside=-1; } } elsif($inside == 0) { my $pat=qr(DBIC); if($a =~ $pat && $b !~ $pat) { $inside=1; } } } @firsts, @seconds; print("@result\n");
|
|---|